<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fred Trotter &#187; PHR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fredtrotter.com/category/phr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com</link>
	<description>Hacktivist, coding for social change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Health: influential, controversial and gone.</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/07/05/google-health-influential-controversial-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/07/05/google-health-influential-controversial-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Exchange (HIE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Internet - Connect project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Internet Direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaningful Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platforms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Health is no more. Thats a shame, because I am writing a book on Health IT for O&#8217;Reilly and before this announcement, my rough draft featured Google Health extensively. I guess this is better, though, than having Google Health shut down just -after- I finished writing my book. Of course, I am going to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/07/05/google-health-influential-controversial-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Health is dead, HealthVault Indivo win</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/06/26/google-health-is-dead-healthvault-indivo-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/06/26/google-health-is-dead-healthvault-indivo-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Internet Direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HealthVault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indivo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Google announce that the Google Health PHR will be retiring. I posted the announcement to the Society for Participatory Medicine mailing list, and there has been alot of discussion about this, there. There are several issues that lots of people do not seem to understand, and some implications of this that have been missed. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2011/06/26/google-health-is-dead-healthvault-indivo-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claims data in PHRs</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/claims-data-in-phrs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/claims-data-in-phrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platforms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Boston Globe has published an article about Dave deBronkart&#8217;s problem with claim data in his Google Health PHR. I think it is awesome that the main stream press is picking up on the problem of using billing data for clinical work! A little digging reveals that there is an much better post over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/claims-data-in-phrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trust but Verify and Trust but Fork</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FOSS Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have enjoyed participating in the National Dialogue about Health IT. One of the challenges put forward to my suggestion that decision makers should insist on FOSS in Health IT, was the following comment:  in terms of privacy, there’s nothing inherent in FOSS that makes it superior to all proprietary products. I have discussed this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coming problem with the ASP-lock</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HealthVault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting post about a person who was locked out of their google account. Apparently, this person lost access to: Google Docs Gmail Family photos in Picasa If you read the updated post, you will find that he has already gotten back in. But this person knew to write a blog post. And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining terms</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAHIT has released its definitions. In summary: An EMR is a record for the doctor. An EHR is a record for the doctors. (with data ready to move) A PHR is a record for the patient. A HIE is the process of moving health data. A HIO is a O that does HIE. A RHIO [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HealthVault team responds to security model criticism.</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 03:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HealthVault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In further evidence that the Microsoft HealthVault team might actually be making good on a move towards real openness. Sean Nolan has addressed some of my criticisms in a post entitled Sharing Data using HealthVault I have updated the post in question to correct the errors that I had made. However, even with the correction [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

