<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fred Trotter &#187; PHR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fredtrotter.com/category/phr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com</link>
	<description>Hacktivist, coding for social change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Trust but Verify and Trust but Fork</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FOSS Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have enjoyed participating in the National Dialogue about Health IT. One of the challenges put forward to my suggestion that decision makers should insist on FOSS in Health IT, was the following comment:
 in terms of privacy, there’s nothing inherent in FOSS that makes it superior to all proprietary products.
I have discussed this issue before, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/10/28/trust-but-verify-and-trust-but-fork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coming problem with the ASP-lock</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GoogleHealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HealthVault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting post about a person who was locked out of their google account.
Apparently, this person lost access to:

Google Docs
Gmail
Family photos in Picasa

If you read the updated post, you will find that he has already gotten back in.
But this person knew to write a blog post. And knew how to get it covered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/08/06/the-coming-problem-with-the-asp-lock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining terms</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAHIT has released its definitions.
In summary:
An EMR is a record for the doctor.
An EHR is a record for the doctors. (with data ready to move)
A PHR is a record for the patient.
A HIE is the process of moving health data.
A HIO is a O that does HIE.
A RHIO is a HIO that is Regional.
Well now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/05/20/defining-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HealthVault team responds to security model criticism.</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 03:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HealthVault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In further evidence that the Microsoft HealthVault team might actually be making good on a move towards real openness. Sean Nolan has addressed some of my criticisms in a post entitled Sharing Data using HealthVault 
I have updated the post in question to correct the errors that I had made. However, even with the correction [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/03/04/healthvault-team-responds-to-security-model-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
