<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fred Trotter &#187; CCHIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fredtrotter.com/category/cchit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com</link>
	<description>Hacktivist, coding for social change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Embracing the new CCHIT certifications</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/24/embracing-the-new-cchit-certifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/24/embracing-the-new-cchit-certifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, CCHIT suffered from what I like to call &#8220;angry letter round 1&#8243;. This is were I send a very pointed, ultimatum letter to an organization of the general form &#8220;your are hurting my community, stop it or else&#8221;. Personally I find that about %50 of organizations respond positively and about %50 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/24/embracing-the-new-cchit-certifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can CCHIT move beyond PROBLEM EHR certification?</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/02/can-cchit-move-beyond-problem-ehr-certification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/02/can-cchit-move-beyond-problem-ehr-certification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently CCHIT has come under fire for being too focused on large proprietary vendors and specifically, its association with HIMSS. These attacks have gotten so bad that Mark Leavitt has posted a rebuttal, which has generated a tremendous amount of attention over at THCB ( a blog well worth adding to your RSS feed) Mark [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/06/02/can-cchit-move-beyond-problem-ehr-certification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCVHS Testimony on Meaningful Use</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/28/ncvhs-testimony-on-meaningful-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/28/ncvhs-testimony-on-meaningful-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOSS Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaningful Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VistA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Update 08-13-09 I have already presented this to NCVHS) Introduction I represent a community of health software developers and clinical users that respect software freedom. This community operates in the legacy of the VA VistA underground railroad. There are several important commercial EHR vendors that respect software freedom they are an important part of our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/28/ncvhs-testimony-on-meaningful-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCHIT Feature bucket</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/cchit-feature-bucket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/cchit-feature-bucket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A central problem with CCHIT is the feature bucket. CCHIT certification represents compliance with a list of hundreds of functional requirements. This would be great if that list of features were 100% a good idea, but the reality is far from the truth. From the FOSS perspective we feel that there is a considerable dumbing-down [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/13/cchit-feature-bucket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards fair EHR certification</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/11/towards-fair-ehr-certification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/11/towards-fair-ehr-certification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The meeting with CCHIT worked. The FOSS community, to the degree that such a thing is possible, had authorized me to go nuclear on the issue before the meeting. I had been given assurance that the community has been so frustrated with dealing with CCHIT that if they did not work with us that if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/11/towards-fair-ehr-certification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCHIT vs FOSS pre-meeting issues</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/06/cchit-vs-foss-pre-meeting-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/06/cchit-vs-foss-pre-meeting-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am preparing for the meeting tomorrow with CCHIT and FOSS. I had previously used Google Moderator to get a feel for what my communities position on this issue is. Moderator allows for the same question to get posted again and again, so often the same idea was represented twice. So ignoring duplicates and ideas [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/04/06/cchit-vs-foss-pre-meeting-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we cover at the CCHIT/FOSS meeting?</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/27/what-should-we-cover-at-the-cchitfoss-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/27/what-should-we-cover-at-the-cchitfoss-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To help answer this question I have setup a Google Moderator site. Please help the FOSS community determine what our positon regarding CCHIT should be!! -FT]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/27/what-should-we-cover-at-the-cchitfoss-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCHIT to meet with FOSS community</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/14/cchit-to-meet-with-foss-community/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/14/cchit-to-meet-with-foss-community/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I was asked by several community members to begin &#8216;activating&#8217; the community at large against certain threats to FOSS in healthcare. Dr. Valdes and I have been planning on doing this for years, and, in our own ways, have both begun to attempt to make the public aware of the issues that our community [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2009/03/14/cchit-to-meet-with-foss-community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should CCHIT survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/11/20/should-cchit-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/11/20/should-cchit-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftrotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCHIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIMSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/11/20/should-cchit-survive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The incomparable Joseph Conn has an article up about the potential fate of CCHIT under the Obama administration. I do not believe that it should be refunded under its current form. For several reasons. First, CCHIT favours proprietary EHR business models vs FOSS EHR business models. CCHIT favours kitchen sink EHRs vs. niche EHR models. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fredtrotter.com/2008/11/20/should-cchit-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

