[ Content | View menu ]

Defining terms

Written on May 20, 2008

NAHIT has released its definitions.

In summary:

An EMR is a record for the doctor.

An EHR is a record for the doctors. (with data ready to move)

A PHR is a record for the patient.

A HIE is the process of moving health data.

A HIO is a O that does HIE.

A RHIO is a HIO that is Regional.

Well now that that is settled, I am sure that the whole industry will stop using the terms EMR and EHR interchangeably. I am sure that no one will refer to a RHIO as an HIE.

Thank God for the government.

-FT

Filed in: Uncategorized.

4 Comments

Write comment - TrackBack - RSS Comments

  1. Comment by Neil Versel:

    Nice snarky commentary, Fred, and right on the money. Except that NAHIT is a private organization. Hope you enjoyed your $7 beer tonight.

    May 21, 2008 @ 1:19 am
  2. Comment by ftrotter:

    I probably should have mentioned that my sarcasm was reserved for Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology who funded the study.

    I rarely drink beer. Even more rarely expensive beer :)

    -FT

    May 21, 2008 @ 1:33 am
  3. Comment by Dana Blankenhorn:

    I thought I would find objection to all that, but I don’t. It will take time for these definitions to take hold in the market, but what’s wrong with clarity?

    God knows I wasted months before figuring out the difference between a PHR and an EMR. Missy Krasner of Google finally set me straight at HIMSS, and I thank God every day for people like her.

    And you, too, Fred.

    May 21, 2008 @ 12:38 pm
  4. Comment by Fred Trotter:

    Thanks…

    I hope in the end it does bring clarity. But as long as some profit from ambiguity, I am not sure it will ever be clear.

    May 21, 2008 @ 8:53 pm
Write comment